Radio Freethinker

Vancouver's Number 1 Skeptical Podcast and Radio Show

  • Welcome to Radio Freethinker!

    Radio Freethinker is a radio show/podcast that promotes skepticism, critical thinking, and secular issues.
  • Follow Us!

  • Categories

  • Archives

Posts Tagged ‘Creationism’

Radio Freethinker Episode 204 – Panda Politics Edition

Posted by Don McLenaghen on March 26, 2013

MAY31483-1024x713

This week:
- New Pope old problems,
- Creationist’s $10,000 challenge,

- Librarians and loyalties, and
Panda Politics

Download the episode here!

——————————————————————————————————————–

New Pope old problems

76228_600We originally thought the new pope, although having his own baggage, was not tainted by the ‘hiding pedophile priest’ scandal. Well, new report shows that even this humble friar had his role in covering up and moving around disgraced clergy.

Find out more:

Creationist’s $10,000 challenge

edgeDr. Joseph Mastropaolo is offering $10,000 to any individual (who is willing to put up their own $10,000)  who can “prove that science contradicts the literal reading of Genesis”. If you win, you get the $20,000. If on the other hand, they prove “proves that science indicates the literal reading of Genesis” they win.

Find out more:

Librarians and loyalties

Fullscreen capture 02072012 25803 PM-001Don reviews changes to the Code of Conduct for Library and Archives of Canada. The insistence of a ‘duty of loyalty’ to the government as opposed to the nation of Canada strikes as tones of totalitarianism. In the light of many other policies, decisions and legislation  one can not help but get the feeling Harper things HE is the nation, civil servants can’t be trusted and the less the people know the better for the government.

Find out more:

Panda Politics

DEA3795sq-1024x1024Pandas has been an intricate part of Chinese diplomacy for centuries. Since the 1970′s the People Republic has used them to open the doors to the non-communist world.

Two of the bi-coloured fur balls are not in Canada; what does it mean, why did we get them and what did we give up? Could our Prime Minster spend his time doing something more important than pimping Pandas?

Find out more:

——————————————————————————————————————–

Skeptical Highlights:

Medicines from the Ivory Tower

What:

The Istituto teams up once again with ARPICO, the Society of Italian Researchers and Professionals of Western Canada, to present a fascinating talk celebrating the 50th anniversary of the awarding of the Nobel Prize to Italian scientist Giulio Natta. Organic chemistry, the branch of chemical science that focuses on carbon-based materials, permits the conversion of basic resources, such as petroleum and coal, into valuable end-products that are the hallmark of technologically advanced societies. Organic chemistry enabled Giulio Natta to usher in the era of advanced plastics. Today, researchers rely on organic chemistry to create the medicines of the future. This talk by UBC’s Prof. Marco Ciufolini will briefly highlight the work of Giulio Natta, before illustrating how advances in organic chemistry are spawning the therapies of the 21st Century.

Where:

Istituto Italiano Di Cultura – 500W. Hastings, Vancover

When:

Wednesday, MAR 27, 2013, 6:15 PM

Cost:

Free

Posted in Show notes | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Radio Freethinker Episode 181 – Science Strikes Back Edition

Posted by Don McLenaghen on September 11, 2012

This week:

- Canada Cuts Diplomatic Ties to Iran
- Organic Shmorganic

- Korean Science strikes back, and
-Interview with Desiree Schell from Sceptically Speaking

Download the episode here!

Canada Cuts Diplomatic Ties to Iran

Syrian Blood Bath

Why did we cut diplomatic ties? What are the issues involved: Nuclear power, human rights, embassy security in the face of ‘western’ sections or protest against Iran’s support for Syria?Why treat Iran different than Russia?Is this a better response to Syrian atrocities than what was done to Libya?

Find out more:

Organic Shmorganic

Another study shows Organic not better than ‘regular’ food; although some important ‘non-health’ issues were left out (ie. environmental, health of farmers….). We discuss yet another blow to the cult-of-organics while acknowledging organic is not all pseudo-science.

Find out more:

Korean Science strikes back

After reporting on the science ‘fail’ of South Korea when attempts by South Korean evangelicals, the Society for Textbook Revise, to have evolution removed from science textbooks looked like they were about to succeed; it seem science has struck back!

This sparked outrage among scientists and the population in general. The resulting furore led the government to set up an 11-member panel, led by the Korean Academy of Science and Technology  and including five experts on evolution and fossils, to oversee science-textbook revisions

We reported the fail, we now report that win!

Find out more:

Interview with Desiree Schell from Sceptically Speaking

Desiree Schell is the host of the live Canadian call-in radio talk show and podcast “Skeptically Speaking”.[1] A Skeptic, Desiree is a strong advocate for critical thinking and is strongly interested in the promotion of skepticism publicly. In her work as a labour organizer, Desiree creates curricula and teaches courses on effective activism.

Find out more:

Skeptical Highlights:

Out of the Blogs and On To the Streets: What Skepticism Can Learn from Social Movements

Organized skepticism is currently at a crossroads – we’re making more public progress than ever before, but there are internal and external challenges that could prevent us from affecting real change. Many social movements have been down this road, and many of them have come through it stronger, more united, and more effective. If social movements are the experts at affecting change, what can we learn from them to apply to our own community?

When:  Friday, September 14th 2012 at 7:00 pm
Where: Room 1700 of SFU Harbour Centre, 555 West Hastings Street, Vancouver
Who: Desiree Schell
Cost: Suggested donation of $2 to $10

Effective Skeptical Activism

A number of politicians have had their careers prematurely cut short because of perceived or actual issues regarding their personal lives. If the issue does not directly relate to their job, is this fair? Does, and should, one’s personal morals or religion reflect upon their professional conduct?

When:  September 15th 2012 at 2:00 pm
Where: Room 2245 SFU Harbour Centre, 555 West Hastings Street, Vancouver
Who: Desiree Schell
Cost: Admission is $20 and includes a copy of Desiree’s guidebook ‘Skeptical Activism’

Video: To the Bat Cave!

Bat biologist Nickolay Hristov, of UNC’s Center for Design Innovation and Winston-Salem State University, develops new techniques for filming and visualizing bats and the caves they occupy. Some of the tools in his kit include a long-range laser scanner–for modelling bat cave morphology–and portable thermal cameras–to capture bat-life when the lights are off.

Wonderful to watch!

lrg-batcave2-090712.mp4

NPR’s Science Friday September Book Club Winner Is…FlatLand

Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions is an 1884 satirical novella by the English schoolmaster Edwin Abbott Abbott. Writing pseudonymously as “a Square”,[1] Abbott used the fictional two-dimensional world of Flatland to offer pointed observations on the social hierarchy of Victorian culture. However, the novella’s more enduring contribution is its examination of dimensions, for which the novella is still popular amongst mathematics, physics, and computer science students.

Free Download: Flatland (illustrated version)

Taking a Scientific approach to public policy…for real!

Government should be more evidence based, and that wherever possible, they should do randomised trials to find out which policy intervention works best. They often have no idea whether the things they do in government actually work or not, and achieve their stated goals.

Ben Goldacre got together with come of his government co-workers and science heads to wrote a  Cabinet Office paper on randomised trials of government policies to explain why randomised trials of policy are so powerful; we explain exactly how to do them; and we explain how to identify a meaningful policy question that can be explored cheaply in a good quality trial.

The paper is not perfect, but a good move in the right direction.

Download: Test, Learn, Adapt: Developing Public Policy with Randomised Controlled Trials

Posted in Show notes | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Dis-Education – Christian home schooling part 1 – Physical Science

Posted by Don McLenaghen on July 27, 2012

This is the first in a three part series into Christian home schooling. Let’s start by looking into ACE…no, not the flying kind or the one in a royal flush but the acronym for Accelerated Christian Education. This has been a popular topic on the inter-web because of new lax textbook requirements in Louisiana and Texas. However, ACE has a Canadian branch which has been providing home schooled Christians un-educational material.

Some of the books on sale currently on the ACE Canada website are:

George Washington, the Christian; A Case for Creation; Ordained of the Lord and Shadow of the Almighty. Nothing unexpected even though I suspect historians may be dubious about Washington. One did catch my attention – “None dare call it conspiracy”. This tasty bit combines the communists, environmentalists, trans-nationals, the UN and others…to form your slightly off standard world conspiracy theory a la one world government/new world order/illuminati. His style, less Christian and more Libertarian, is known as ‘Producerism’…where the productive people of the world are being parasitize by the OTHER. It’s acceptable to ACE because they share some common themes like ‘traditional values’; God rewards the righteous and biblical end-times scenarios. The first chapter though is very telling; it’s entitled – ‘Don’t confuse me with the facts’. Very much in line with ACE teaching philosophy.

So, we will discuss not only the bad science in these works but also the bad social science and some more sinister implications of this style of teaching.

First some of the things children are being dis-learned about science.

The Loch Ness Monster Disproves Evolution

According to Christian home schooling dis-learning material:
“Are dinosaurs alive today? Scientists are becoming more convinced of their existence. Have you heard of the `Loch Ness Monster’ in Scotland? `Nessie,’ for short has been recorded on sonar from a small submarine, described by eyewitnesses, and photographed by others. Nessie appears to be a plesiosaur.”

Nessie appears to be a plesiosaur so dinosaurs are not millions of years old and did exist with humans.

Now, the fact that Nessie has long been shown to be a myth…even crypto-zoologist have pretty much given up on Nessie after a complete sonar scan of the Loch 1987 and again in 2003 for the show “Searching for the Loch Ness Monster”on BBC which found nothing.

Now, the Loch Ness Monster is still trendy in the popular press so it’s an easy plot point (I say plot point because religion’s like fiction you must remember you plot) everyone THINKS they know. We remember the ‘photo evidence’ (which is not evidence) and the ‘dramatizations’ but rarely the ‘depression’ of real documentary shows that prove its fiction.

A Japanese Whaling Boat Found a Dinosaur

Like Nessie, this is supposed to be evidence that proves dinosaurs are still here. Of course the evidence is a couple of photos of what a Japanese fishing trawler hulled up in the late 70s. If you look at one of the photos quickly you may see something that might look like a long necked thing, but the condition of the carcass is in extreme decay. That is there is no skin, little flesh…and looking at it, it’s your standard well decayed thing…possibly a shark, that’s what they thought in 1977 when it was found. Looking at the other photos you see thinks like dorsal fins indicative of a shark.

Now, why put this in? Sowing seeds so when a child (or when their grownup) is confronted with the overwhelming evidence about the existence of dinosaurs then have a ‘mental’ safe room to compartmentalized it. They might say ‘Yes, of course dinosaurs existed…along with people, but God let them all die during the Noah’s flood’; or something like that.

Humans and Dinosaurs Co-Existed

Fossilised human footprints have been found alongside dinosaur tracks in the bed of the Paluxy River, Texas. Now there are a number of photos of these on the internet. However, there have been two explanations for this apparent anomaly. First, they were faked. The most ‘convincing’ human foot prints complete with toe prints are on souvenir rocks, not those in situ (i.e. those still part of the ancient river bed). It apparently was a booming business during the depression to sell moonshine and fossils. When either ran low, they just went to the shack and made some more (i.e. faked ‘fossils’).

The other explanation is erosion. When the tracks are made, the soft mud often falls into the track, giving them an distorted appearance, coupled with erosion from natural elements, can transform three toed dino prints into a human foot shape heal print…these don’t have toe prints.

Why would ACE et al, use such poor ‘evidence’ when once released into the reality based world they will be confronted with what I have just mentioned? If their aim was to educate then it would be stupid but we are talking about dis-education; their aim, at least in areas of theology, it to set up thinking processes and ways of ‘learning’ that impede and retard education. It is not good enough for them not to know the facts of the world but they must also attempt to ensure they can never truly learn them ever.

Solar Fusion is a Myth

The sun is shrinking because it is burning up its fuel, in the conventional BBQ sense of burning. So, the earth can’t be billions of years old, the Sun would have to be bigger than the orbit of the Earth if the solar system was billions of years old – HA! Take that science.

This sounds kooky to most people so why say it? Well, first I must ask do you (my loyal reader) know how solar…well any nuclear fusion works? Simply put, it’s the mashing together of two small atoms to make a bigger atom plus a s#it load of energy. To do this, you must have the atoms very close together and energetic (i.e. hot). This happens when a massive body…like the sun…compresses under its own weight. The pressure and heat at the center skyrockets until a point where two hydrogen atoms fuse to form helium plus energy. The energy pushes back on gravity, stops the sun collapsing and gives us light (not the mythical guy ACE would like you to credit).

The Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Evolution.

The entropy of a closed system cannot decrease.” They take it to mean things invariably progress from order to disorder. Therefor the Earth was created in a perfect ordered state (Garden of Eden) and is progressively becoming more decayed and disordered over time…until the big G pulls the plug (Armageddon).

Now in a closed system this is true, the order to disorder part, not the God stuff. However life, earth…even the galaxies are not closed systems. The universe as a whole, is dissipating…a better term that disorder. That is why one of the theories of the ‘end of the universe’ is the Big Freeze; where mater/energy is so evenly disperses in the universe there will be nothing but cold atoms (Quarks?).

Life on earth gets increased energy because the sun, to name one thing, inputs energy…or in our context order…into the ‘evolutionary’ system; thus giving the appearance of violating the 2nd law but not really.

No Transitional Fossils Exist…enough said.

Sorry, for those new to this argument, check here, I can’t waste my time on this one.  Five Major Misconceptions about Evolution

Scientists Believe the “Hopeful Monster” Theory

“Theory states that certain organisms experienced (for some unexplained reason) a dramatic genetic disturbance that hurled them across the gap left by the missing links”

They have a cute cartoon to explain this theory…as they see it the last hope for evolution…line one has a fish plus a fish equals a fish, the next has a fish plus a fish plus genetic disturbance equals a frog.

This is what I can only believe is willful misunderstanding of evolution. I don’t want to restate what may be obvious to most of our listeners but there are two major camps in evolutionary thinking the gradual evolution and punctuate evolution. The first holds that gradual changes over hundreds…thousands…millions of years gradual selects for adaptations best suited for the organisms environment; thus leading to speciation…classic evolution.

Punctuated evolution, still controversial, posits that in isolated groups, like those stranded on an island…let’s say the Galapagos…evolution can be accelerated and more dramatic. Create a new species in the space of decades or centuries.

Creationists believe that we believe that two frogs have sex and give birth to a duck. This shows their misunderstanding of the term random mutation. The term does not mean the comic book style mutation where parents give birth to a Nightcrawler of the X-Men but where a gene or 10 are mis-copied in such a way as to create a new trait/resistance/what have you…but these are small changes. There is a great example in the recently published work of one scientist who over decades ‘evolved’ bacteria to digest citrate.

This ties into the other elements (i.e. Solar Fusion, fossils, geology such as the Grand Canyon) where they are desperate to show the earth is young…bible young…six thousand-ish. Because evolution posits change over a LONG period of time, if they can deny science time, it implicitly denies evolution and this protects the biblical account of the ‘creation’.

Part of their problem with evolution is it implies that ‘creation’ was not perfect that God is not perfect. However, they do not stop with evolution because creationist believe God created a perfect world and will ensure his creation does not end…well until he decides to kill everyone off during Armageddon. There for they make claims like…

It “cannot be shown scientifically that man-made pollutants will one day drastically reduce the depth of the atmosphere’s ozone layer.”

“God has provided certain ‘checks and balances’ in creation to prevent many of the global upsets that have been predicted by environmentalists.”

This is why Republicans in the US and Conservatives here have been pushed to reject ‘Climate Change’ because of the power of the evangelical movement. Oddly enough it also provides a great example as to why religion is so antithetical to ANY science.

If a fundamentalist Christian accepts climate change they make two dangerous acknowledgments. First, that God’s creation is not perfect and that when it says in the Bible that after the great flood God will ensure the world is a nice place to be until the end-times…then climate change will make the Earth a NOT nice place to be…it will be a refutation of the promise of God…so it is the first step in rejecting biblical literalism

Related to that is… if you accept that science can show/prove climate change, then why not accept its evidence for solar fusion…for evolution…for the great length of time from ‘creation’…to the un-necessity of a God at all. It’s a slippery slope of rationality and creationist what nothing to do with that.

ACE science curriculum is not to educate children but to arm them with the ability to reject science when they are free of the cocoon of the home school. Teach a child to not learn, and they will be ignorant for life…so sayeth the Lord.

The next segment we will leave the realm of the physical science for Christian home schooling views on the Social Sciences.

Posted in Blogs, Don's Blogs | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Radio Freethinker Episode 173 – Dis-Education Edition

Posted by Don McLenaghen on July 3, 2012

This week:

- Hitting kids crazy,

- What’s to hate about standardized testing, and

- Dis-education – A look at the harms of Christian home schooling

Download the episode here!

Topics:

Hitting you kids crazy

We talk about a new study about the correlation between mental illness and levels of corporal punishment on children.  

Find out more:

What’s to hate about standardized testing?

Responding to an article published in Washington Post, we discuss the pros and cons of standardized testing. And yes, there will be an exam on this.

Find out more:

Dis-education – A look at the harms of Christian home schooling

We take an extended look at the ACE (Accelerated Christian Education) curriculum and what some home schooling text-book are actually teach our children about the physical sciences as well as the social sciences.

Find out more:

Skeptical Highlights:

Mind Lab

“Mind Lab,” laboratory of the mind, houses four short introductory movies and sixteen trials with those you can experience visual phenomena and illusions used for study in psychological experiments.

Mind Lab

WELCOME TO SKEPTICISM 101!

The Skeptical Studies Curriculum Resource Center –  Skeptic.com has released a new resource for teachers and skeptics for class rooms and public education. THE SKEPTICAL STUDIES CURRICULUM RESOURCE CENTER its a comprehensive, free repository of resources for teaching students how to think skeptically. This Center contains an ever-growing selection of books, reading lists, course syllabi, in-class exercises, PowerPoint presentations, student projects, papers, and videos that you may download and use in your own classes.

SKEPTICISM 101

Posted in Show notes | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

South Korea Creationist Controversy

Posted by Ethan Clow on June 13, 2012

In all time science fails committed on a national scale, this one has to be near the top. South Korea has banned evolution from its text books across the country, giving into pressure from creationists.

Nature reported on this shocking national “dumbening” (my words) of S. Korea.

It began when a petition to remove references to evolution from high-school textbooks succeeded last month after the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) revealed that many of the publishers would produce revised editions that exclude examples of the evolution of the horse or of avian ancestor Archaeopteryx. Not surprisingly, the country’s leading biologists were not consulted.

The campaign was led by the Society for Textbook Revise (STR), which aims to delete the “error” of evolution from textbooks to “correct” students’ views of the world, according to the society’s website.

The STR is an independent offshoot of the Korea Association for Creation Research (KACR), according to KACR spokesman Jungyeol Han. Thanks in part to the KACR’s efforts, creation science — which seeks to provide evidence in support of the creation myth described in the Book of Genesis — has had a growing influence in South Korea.

In a 2009 survey conducted for the South Korean documentary The Era of God and Darwin, almost one-third of the respondents didn’t believe in evolution. Of those, 41% said that there was insufficient scientific evidence to support it; 39% said that it contradicted their religious beliefs; and 17% did not understand the theory. The numbers approach those in the United States, where a survey by the research firm Gallup has shown that around 40% of Americans do not believe that humans evolved from less advanced forms of life.

About half the people of South Korea practice religion, of which the two most popular are Christianity and Buddhism.

Specifically, references to Archaeopteryx (one of the most famous transitional fossils ever) have been removed. The Society for Textbook Revision also plans to have references to human evolution and finch beaks as well.

As I was reading more about this story I saw a few comments from South Koreans who were taking issue with some of the phrasing of the story. A few have suggested this is at most a hollow victory for creationists. They attest that evolution will still be taught in South Korean high schools and the removal of material from the text books is small in comparison to the amount of science that is being taught.

I can understand that. This clearly isn’t a death blow to science. It’s not like universities are being closed down and biologists are being fired and locked up in prison. That being said, this is a big deal. We’ve seen the direction that creationist activists in the US have been working to undermine the science in America. They frequently infiltrate school boards and rely on support from their conservative religious public to help them manipulate the system.

They also disguise their attack as scientific criticism, referring to creationism as “creation science” or “intelligent design”. These tactics are meant to sew doubt amongst moderate believers. Give them the impression that perhaps there is scientific debate about evolution. This manufactured controversy then fuels more “revision” and “debate” which further drives this wedge of misunderstanding and undermines the teaching of evolution.

South Koreans should be very worried about this and not try to shrug this off as a small victory for creationists.

I saw something else while I was researching this. Have you heard of the TIMSS? Beginning in 1995 and every four years thereafter, The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) has been conducted. TIMSS tests fourth, eighth and 12th grade students around the globe on both science and mathematics and the huge data set allows knowledge levels to be compared by country.

In science, students in the United States ranked third at the fourth grade level but fell to 17th at the eighth grade level and rose slightly to 16th at the 12th grade level. Students from South Korea, in comparison, were first and fourth in fourth and eighth grade, respectively. (South Korea didn’t test their 12th grade students.)

to quote Dr. Michael Zimmerman in his article on the Huffington Post

“Koreans will soon realize that when biology education removes evolution as the organizing principle for the discipline, students will no longer be able to make sense of the science. Without evolution serving as the central idea tying all facets of biology together, all that’s left is a collection of random facts and experiments. Teaching biology without evolution is akin to teaching history simply by asking students to memorize dates. No context, no integration of ideas, no learning.”

Posted in Blogs, Ethan's Blogs | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Radio Freethinker Episode 170 – Korean Fail Edition

Posted by Don McLenaghen on June 12, 2012

This week:

- South Korea removed evolution from schools,
Belief in god relies on thinking like god,
- Reproductive music,
- The real cost of secondary education (Part 1 of 2 interview with Iglika Ivanova)

Download the episode here!

Topics:
South Korea removed evolution from schools

Under pressure from religious groups in South Korea, publishers of science textbook have removed any reference to evolution.

Find out more:

Belief in god relies on thinking like god

Resent studies into Autism spectrum have shown that an ability to ‘think like another’, called mentalizing, maybe one of the factors leading to a (false) belief in a personal god.

Find out more:

Reproductive music
(Sorry folk, ran out of time. Look for this story on the next show)
Research has shown the obvious that sex sells but how it manifest itself in different genre of music and the dubious link to evolutionary advantage make it an interesting topic for the show.

Find out more:

The real cost of secondary education

Don’s sits down with Iglika Ivanova in the Radio Free Thinker virtual studio and discusses Tuition fees and university funding.

Iglika Ivanova is a research economist at the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives for BC.

Find out more:

Skeptical Highlights:

Why Do Religions Endure?

Another Philosophers’ Cafe forum where Charles Marxer ponders why religions endure and why anyone would imagine they wouldn’t.

When: June 13 at 7pm
Where: White Rock Central Library
Cost: Free

Ethics & the Marijuana Business: Why We Need to Make Pot Legal

As part of the Workplace Centre for Spiritual & Ethical Development’s Ethics for Breakfast Series, legal-affairs columnist Ian Mulgrew leads a discussion about the legal and ethical implications of legalizing marijuana.

When: June 13 from 7:15-8:30am
Where: BC Hydro Building – 333 Dunsmuir
Cost: $10

SlutWalk Vancouver

SlutWalk Vancouver is a satellite event of SlutWalk Toronto. The original SlutWalk event was organized in 2011 as a response to a comment made by a Toronto Police officer who suggested to York students that they could prevent being assaulted if they avoided dressing like “sluts”. The organizers of SlutWalk Vancouver recognized that the culture of victim blaming and sex shaming that this officer’s comments represent is very much alive in Vancouver. Our aim is to confront “common sense” notions about victims – which we believe is aptly captured in how “slut” is used to degrade and devalue women. We believe we can challenge the culture of victim blaming by creating a safe space to start a thousand conversations about ending the blame.

http://slutwalkvancouver.com/

Posted in Show notes | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Pseudo Censorship

Posted by Don McLenaghen on January 9, 2012

A University of Louisiana professor is suing his university for violation of his first amendment rights by both criticizing his methods as well as preventing him from teaching

The first anti-vaxxers

Professor John Oller Jr., who worked in the Communicative Disorders Department, claims the Dean of Arts became hostile to his theories and systematically excluded him from teaching students. There have been reductions of his class size, a banning of his self-authored textbook, a lack of lecture opportunities and, according to Oller, a general ostracization by his fellow professors. Communicative Disorders Department deals with topics like Autism, Dyslexia and learning disabilities that affect communications. Oller specializes in sign language but more recently has focused on Autism. In 2010 he published a book – Autism: The Diagnosis, Treatment, & Etiology of the Undeniable Epidemic. The forward is written by Andrew Wakefield.

In the book, he promotes the false link between vaccination and the supposed ‘autism’ epidemic. Remember, his expertise is in linguistics not immunology or even biology.  There is more; he is also a believer in Intelligent Design and Creationism. He has spoken many times to the Louisiana legislature as an expert to promote the teaching of ID in Louisiana high school biology curriculum.

Oller, when presenting himself to the legislature, is seen as a doctor, as a member of the faculty of the University of Louisiana…using this position of respectability and authority, he gave testimony on a subject matter (biology/evolution) that he has no expertise. As a public representative of the university, this has a direct impact on the image and credibility of the university in general and the faculty of Communicative Disorders directly.

Oller is also a tenured professor…that is, unless he kills a student, he cannot be fired. Usually tenure protects professors from inappropriate persecution, however occasionally the discrimination is warranted, as in this case. Oller has used his academic and teaching platform to espouse his outlandish theories about both the causes of autism and the belief it’s an epidemic…theories in fields that are not his area of expertise. It is because of this that the department attempted to limit the damage he could do in his attempt to pollute students minds. If he had limited his teaching time…his lectures to discussing aspects of overcoming communication deficiencies of those affected by autism…maintained his comments to disorders that affect communication; the position of the dean would be weak.

The Dean and several faculty members (there does not seem to be any faculty that support Oller) mention that on several occasions they have had to deal with issues arising from Oller’s teaching and that they had been told by many his presence hurts the department’s credibility. Again, Oller is welcome to his own personal opinions that he may express and promote on his personal time; however if he uses his academic position to forward his cause…misusing his credential by implying knowledge in topics he does not have credentials…this transforms his personal activities to activities that have implications for the university…a transformation that gives the university a say (veto?) in how he presents himself in those occasions.

Evolution of the Creationist

He is, in part, being defended by the ADF – Alliance Defence Fund, a servant organization that provides the resources that will keep the door open for the spread of the Gospel through the legal defense of religious freedom, the sanctity of life, marriage and the family. Sorry for the ad hominem…

Okay, I think we have three issues here – is he competent to teach his subject, does his professional activities outside teaching (and outside the university) provide the university justification for workplace actions and lastly does his private activities provide the university justification for workplace actions?

Now, on the first case, Oller was hired to teach about methods of communications and issues arising from that. He was NOT hired to comment, speculate or imply in his capacity as an instructor on the root causes of Autism. Now, instructors are often give some leeway to provide ‘editorial’ comment in class (take any class in political science or economics and you will hear at least one tangential theory from your professor); that said it is unclear specifically how far Oller expounded on his ‘theories’ in class but considering his self-authored textbook, it does appear to be more than a passing comment…to the point where is appears to be a central tenet of his instruction. So, on this ground the university was with its rights to ‘silence’ him.

On the second grounds, his promotion of both anti-vaccination and creationism would involve the university if he gave such lectures through the university lecture circuit or in off-campus activities where he identified himself as both an expert on subject he did not actual have accreditation AND affiliated himself with the university.  In doing this, and again it has been claimed by the faculty that he did this not irregularly, he not only risks his own professional reputation but also that of the faculty and university he is associated with. Again, it seems the university has a right to censor his activities as best they can.

On the last point, where he promotes his ‘wacky’ ideas on his own time as ‘just a regular citizen’; although I find his views offensive and dangerous; I do not think the university has the right to interfere with these aspects of his life. IT may, as collateral damage, tarnish the image is a report Googles his name and discovers he is a faculty member but that is not the offence of Oller. However, it seem Oller was not content to limit is activities to ‘private citizen’ acts but used the weight (and thus the prestige) of both his position and his association with a credible institution to make his outlandish remarks.

It’s a shame he will be used in future as an argument against the tenure system. It has it faults but it does provide academics the freedom to be a counterbalance to the establishment; however when one wishes to be counter-establishment there is a greater weight upon them to ensure their views can be backed up with evidence and that they are not a throwback to a disproved and discredited point of view.

Posted in Blogs, Don's Blogs | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Saturday Stub: Monkeys in Tennessee

Posted by Ethan Clow on April 9, 2011

A couple weeks ago I blogged about a new bill in Texas called HB 2454, the bill was being presented to the Texas House of Representatives by Republican State representative Bill Zedler. The bill would make it easier to teach creationism in Texas Universities by preventing “discrimination” by said universities against professors who decide to teach creationism.

Now the state of Tennessee has passed a pro-creationist bill of its own. House Bill 368 the bill requires educational authorities to

“Create an environment within public elementary and secondary schools that encourages students to explore scientific questions, learn about scientific evidence, develop critical thinking skills, and respond appropriately and respectfully to differences of opinion about controversial issues;”

Doesn’t sound so bad, but it also states that educational authorities are forbidden to

“prohibiting any teacher in a public school system of this state from helping students understand, analyze, critique, and review in an objective manner the scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses of existing scientific theories covered in the course being taught, such as evolution and global warming”

Sounds pretty anti-science, but also pretty wasteful. Does not the teaching of science on its own encourage the development of critical thinking skills? Must a seperate bill be passed to encourage such teaching?

The sponsor of HB 368, Republican Bill Dunn, claimed that teaching “intelligent design” would not be protected under this bill. However, its chief lobbyist, David Fowler of the Family Action Council of Tennessee, claimed otherwise in an article he wrote for the website Chattanoogan.


In 1925, John Washington Butler introduced the Butler Act in Tennessee that prevented the teaching of evolution. John Scopes, a biology teacher was charged under this act in what became the famous Scopes Monkey Trial, it was a profound moment in American history with long lasting repercussion in the arena of science, education and religion. HB 368 is another chapter in this long conflict between science and religion. But the language has changed. Now, fundamentalists are cloaking their attempts to stifle science with words of science. They encourage students to ” explore scientific questions, learn about scientific evidence, develop critical thinking skills and respond appropriately and respectfully to differences of opinion about controversial issues” (empathasis mine)

How should we respond to scientific questions? How should we respond to scientific evidence? Good questions, should we get angry? Should we get informed? What is the appropriate response? Who defines appropriate in this case?

Of course, they’re only differences of opinion, you say tomato, I say tomahto, right? Science is just one way of looking at the world, equally valid as, say, reading the bible? Right?

And of course, evolution is a controversial issue, right? It’s not like the vast majority of biological science is based on the theory of evolution and that every respectable and established scientific intuition in the world, relying on empirical evidence and repeated testing, hasn’t confirmed it to be one of the most consistently proven scientific tenets?

That’s what I thought.

Posted in Blogs, Ethan's Blogs | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Saturday Stub: More Academic Freedom to be Wrong

Posted by Ethan Clow on March 19, 2011

Remember Dr. Martin Gaskell? The astronomer who sued the University of Kentucky because they didn’t hire him because he was (supposedly) a creationist? Well, if things go right for Bill Zedler in Texas, such a trampling of academic freedom won’t ever happen again.

Bill Zedler, is a Republican State representative from Texas and he is proposing a new bill, entitled HB 2454, which, if passed, would prevent universities in Texas from:

“discriminate against or penalize in any manner, especially with regard to employment or academic support, a faculty member or student based on the faculty member’s or student’s conduct of research relating to the theory of intelligent design or other alternate theories of the origination and development of organisms.” – HB 2454

The bill was introduced in the Texas House of Representatives on March 8th and continues the long, tired and stupid notion of “academic freedom” to teach wrong things but pretend they’re true. Proponents of teaching creationism or “intelligent design” like to throw around the notion of “academic freedom.” Its a handy little phrase to depict themselves as part of a noble but suppressed cadre of scientists who are trying to research and teach an alternative to the religion theory of Darwinism. (It’s only a theory)

Here’s a nice quote from the good people of the Texas Freedom Network:

“The bottom line for us? Institutions of higher education should — and do — protect academic freedom. Rep. Zedler’s bill would instead require our colleges and universities to aid and protect academic fraud. But with the State Board of Education promoting anti-science propaganda in public schools, we shouldn’t be surprised that higher education is increasingly a target as well.”

 

Posted in Blogs, Ethan's Blogs | Tagged: , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Creationist Clashes in British Columbia

Posted by Ethan Clow on October 29, 2010

(Cross posted on Skeptic North)

Recently a creationists, one Dr. Jonathan Sarfati, (his PhD is in chemistry) has been touring in British Columbia speaking on the subject of evolution. The title of his talk is “Evolution: The Greatest Hoax on Earth” which is his way of suggesting that he can refute the claims made by Richard Dawkins in his latest book “The Greatest Show on Earth.”

My esteemed co-hosts and I on Radio Freethinker discussed this event on our most recent episode, and my friend the Crommunist blogged about it over at Canadian Atheist.

Dr. Sarfati, the founder of Creation Ministries International is a Christian apologist who believes in the literal truth of the bible and specifically biblical creationism. For those that don’t know, creationism is the belief that life on earth arose according to the accounts in Genesis (Earth created in 7 days and 10,000 years ago) and not through the process of evolution (a billion year process of natural selection)

As far as creationists go, he has nothing new to say nor is he particularly good at delivering his message.

Why this warrants a blog post is that when skeptics in Vancouver and abroad learned that he intended to deliver his speech at the University of British Columbia as well as several other important venues across the province, many of us were concerned.  We decided it would be prudent to set up an evolution information booth at the event so that attendee’s would be able to get some actual science content instead of Christian dogma.

In Vancouver, our biggest concern was that he was speaking at a university. By nature of the university itself (dedication to research, facts, honesty, education) we felt this lent Dr. Sarfati undue credibility. You can read an article about Dr. Sarfati’s talk at UBC in the Ubyssey, the campus newspaper, although it makes no mention of the pro-evolution contingent at the lecture.

Getting a booth proved difficult. Fortunately persistence paid off and CFI Vancouver, the UBC Freethinkers and the UBC Biology department teamed up to put together some evolution literature and experts at hand to properly explain the science.

Sarfati was also doing talks in Surrey later that day but unfortunately we were unable to get an information booth for that talk. We suspect having the support of the UBC Biology department made our request more likely to be accepted at UBC, however his speaking engagement in Surrey wasn’t in a university but a private venue.

We set up our booth outside his lecture and had many people come up to us to see what we were about. It was actually quite successful, many students who didn’t have a background in science came over to us and eagerly asked questions, which our biology experts were all too happy to answer. We had several science, skeptic and evolution books which people were encouraged to leaf through and look at.

When time came for the talk we took some seats inside and took notes. However, as I mentioned, this was a farce of a lecture, even by creationist standards.

I mentioned on Radio Freethinker that Dr. Sarfati was a clown. I of course realize that’s an ad hominem but it’s very apt. He began his lecture by stating that scientists like Dawkins have different starting assumptions when it comes to biology, Dr. Sarfati has the bible, and Dawkins has Darwin. (Neglecting to mention that while Sarfati begins with the assumption that the bible is literal truth, Dawkins doesn’t believe Darwin to be gospel.)

Sarfati also has some interesting views on science itself. He suggests that it was born out Christianity, which explains why Western Christendom was so advanced. (The Dark Ages weren’t really all that dark, he assured the audience.) He further explained that believing in evolution would lead to moral bankruptcy and ultimately atheism (which was very bad)

Aside from the fact that his historical interpretation of the history of science and Christianity is completely wrong, his understanding of how science works also seems completely off base.

His evidence for why evolution can’t possibly be true is staggeringly silly. Consider his case against fossils, which can’t exist because “what happens when a fish dies? Look at your goldfish, it floats!” How could it get to the bottom of the ocean to fossilize? He questions enthusiastically. Throw out your Origin of the Species, everyone!

Of course he also argues that life is simply too irreducibly complex to happen by chance. After all, if things look designed, they must be!

He takes particular exception to the notion of life emerging from non-living components. To illustrate the absurdity of this, he asks the audience what would happen if you put a frog in a blender and added energy? He shows a slide of a blender with frog goop and says “this is what happens when you add energy, not in a million years is a frog going to hop out of that mess.”

He repeatedly hammered that evolution doesn’t “add information” it only results in life becoming more specialized and therefore couldn’t possibly be true. As most creationists do, he constructs a straw man argument and proceeds to knock it down. He really wanted us to understand that mutations are not adding information, “after all” he explains, “most mutations do stupid things like giving a bulldog a smushed nose.” And who wants a smushed nose?

When it came time to answer questions he wasn’t particularly interested in hearing counter arguments. Rather belligerently he would shout down anyone who raised a critical question. Any time a biology professor asked something he would make some comment on them indoctrinating students into atheism.

His obnoxious attitude was so aggressively aimed at the sciences that I was shocked by the way several audience members who weren’t skeptics reacted. Many cheered as Dr. Sarfati lambasted biology professors for teaching evolution and brainwashing innocent young people who come to learn about the natural world. Not only was this insulting to the professors, but several biology students found it offensive as well. There was one protracted argument between Dr. Sarfati and a student that sounded like a school yard dispute then scholarly discourse. Over the course of the question period several skeptics end up walking out in frustration. I don’t blame them, I’ve never actually seen someone so obnoxious.

His demurer didn’t improve. He would later visit the University of British Columbia’s Okanagan campus. Alas, there were more skeptics there too.

CFI Okanagan and the UBCO Skeptics also set out to ask some probing questions of Dr. Sarfati.

He was not pleased to say the least. Several skeptics in Kelowna decide to wear t-shirts saying “Creationism: a Philosophy of Ignorance.” He was further incensed when skeptics tried to ask some critical questions. Unlike in Vancouver where the audience was roughly evenly divided between skeptics and creationists, in Kelowna the skeptics were definitely in the minority. At one point a philosophy professor was even threatened with a head lock by a creationist in the audience when he pointed out some of Dr. Sarfati’s logical fallacies.

His respectability metre went down even further when he made some racially insensitive remarks following his lecture that left several CFI Okanagan members justly shocked.

Some would characterize Dr. Sarfati as the fish in the barrel. I think that’s a mistake. About 1/3rd of the audience at UBC was sympathetic to his point and more so at UBCO. Where we should be concerned is that this guy isn’t even a good speaker! His arguments by creationist standards are bad! And he’s a jerk too! The point being, if someone this poorly informed is allowed to direct the conversation on evolution in universities, skeptics may find themselves in a difficult position down the road where they occupy a small minority in lecture halls where creationism and evolution are taught as two legitimate theories of biology and any attempt to criticize this bizarre scenario results in the threat of a head lock. A head lock that encompasses all forms of rational discourse, scientific inquiry and public education.

 

Posted in Blogs, Ethan's Blogs | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 248 other followers