Posted by Don McLenaghen on January 29, 2012
Okay, we have thrashed out all the arguments the prophets put forward to support their golden view…they seem lacking at best and fictional at worse; but what about the current economic meltdown?
There is a major problem with the world’s economy…the US economy. The US did not spend enough to get itself out of the recession. Most economists now think if the US had doubled or more its stimulus spending, the economy would be back to a healthy state. You ask “what about the downgrade in the US’s credit rating?” Well that had NOTHING to do with the American debt; the US economy, dollar and treasury bill are still considered the safest investment on the planet (safer than gold?). The downgrade occurred because of political manipulation of a political minority (the GOP)…S&P stated it was the political instability NOT economic that prompted it to downgrade. The prophets feed into this hysteria to capitalize on the public fear to promote their radical change (I would recommend reading “Shock Doctrine” by Naomi Klein). It has never been cheaper for the US to raise money that now.
Now, the debt is a long-term issue; I am not saying that it is not but I am also saying that it is not the time to worry about it. Reasonable and effective stimulus via spending is more important than debt reduction (and tax cuts do NOT effectively stimulate). Those who follow the prophets, SHOULD insist that when the economy has recovered the government must resist demand to cut taxes but should instead increase them and pay down the deficit when times are good and to place the nation in a position so as to be able to take on the next economic downturn.
“But what about THIS recession? Was it not caused by fiat money? By a high debt?” No!
The current troubles were not caused by government manipulation of the currency nor the debt. Almost every economist (left and right including the infamous Greenspan) blames lack of regulation for the current debacle. The prophets (when not praising gold) staunchly support the laissez faire approach to the economy… a completely free and unregulated market. They say this in spite of the fact that the current crash is directly the result of under-regulation…that in no point in history has unregulated markets led to stable economics. History has shown that deregulation always leads to short term instability and long term monopolistic markets (near absence of competition).
“What about Greece, Italy…they have fiat money and are about to default on their debt; explain that!”
Loss of options
None of the problems had anything to do with the type of (fiat) currency these countries had. In fact, the trouble they currently have is because they cannot just print money. The Euro is not in the control of Greece or Italy…it’s in the control of the European Central Bank. They do have a problem with ‘bonds’ and the need to secure new bonds to keep paying the bills and pay off old bonds that have come due. A countries credit rating is intended to provide lenders a guideline as to the likelihood a nation might default on its loans; this then determines the interest rate lenders can ask.
For a company, a lender would renegotiate the loan – better to take a small loss and let the company recover to repay then lose it all by forcing a bankruptcy. However, in the case of a nation…a nation with the backing of the Euro, there is no chance it will go bankrupt…or default (long term at least) on its debt; there is no incentive for the creditors to ‘work with Greece’ to help its economy recover. To make its bond payments, Greece is forced to reduce its spending because it cannot ‘print more money’…the Euro for Greece is like a fixed currency…the economy goes into recession leading to less tax income so less money to pay lenders and the cycle continues.
Huff and Puff!
The current holders of Greek debt are hedge funds which bought the Greek bonds from other less speculative lenders at a discount; they then turned around and purchased insurance on the debt. The speculators have no interest in helping Greece recover its economy but only to see how much money it can squeeze out of the Greeks. It is true Greece put itself into this bind but we are seeing that the interdependence of a fixed currency can cause financial repercussions over the whole global economy. The speculators know eventually the European Central Bank or the International Monetary Fund will step in; make good on the loans and turn Greece into a third world country…they will then repeat the process in Spain, Portugal, Italy…if it takes the rest of
The dark side of finance.
Europe down, speculators can still invest in China. The main point in our context is none of this would have been avoided by the gold standard in fact because relative to Greece, the Euro is a fixed currency; it shows that the gold standard would have made no difference and caused the same economic crisis Greece et al are now experiencing in the Euro Zone. In fact it provided a counter-factual because if the Greek’s had their own fiat money, it may have provided Greece a way out of its bond crisis (although still at a price).
“Okay, but more than Greece has experienced a drop in its credit rating…admit it, it’s their debt that caused this problem!”
Now, Greece and more importantly France (among others) have experienced a downgrade in their borrowing grade NOT because they have too large a debt (although for Greece that is part of it) but because they are trying to reduce the debt through austerity measures. There has been a complete misstep that politicians around the globe (reflecting the neo-liberal/neo-conservative revolution that has occurred in the last couple of decades) have become obsessed with reducing the size of government, the deficit and a removal of government regulations on ‘the market’. As mentioned earlier it was deregulation that was at the heart of the current financial crisis however those who have profited from this ‘unfettered capitalism’ do not want regulations to return so the blame for the economic debacle has been laid at the feet of the debt. The only way the pro-corporate right wing governments see to reduce the debt is to reduce government size and government spending. So, countries like Britain and France have been imposing austerity measures in the false hope they will ‘stimulate the economy’ from the current recession. This is like inflicting deeper cuts on a person who is bleeding to death; it will only hasten death.
"It shall collapsing under the weight of its own contradictions" Marx
In one of those twists, the rating agencies are beginning to acknowledge that government spending in times of recession is good…that failure to do so will make an nation a greater credit risk; thus France is downgraded. I say twist because it is those very same credit rating agencies that graded the toxic Credit Default Swaps from bad housing loans as Grade A that started this current bust cycle. The problems the current nations are experiencing are not universally safer because some nations are willing to spend more to (at least) reduce the decline into recession or attempt to recover. If all nations were locked into the gold standard then the global economy would not be teetering on the edge for a couple of years, it very well have slammed head into a decade’s long depression like we experience a century ago…while on the gold standard!
 Sadly, in the ‘new left’ which has replaced the ‘socialist left’ are corporate ponds. The Labour of the UK is not pro-union but pro-business as its actions have shown. This is seen in the US with the difference between the Dems and the GOP being how much and how far they are willing to go in lowering taxes and cutting spending.
Posted in Blogs, Don's Blogs | Tagged: American debt, Austrian School, Bank of Canada, Chicago School, Credit Default Swaps, crisis, deficit, Democrate, European Central Bank, federal reserve, fiat money, fixed currency, fractional reserve system, free market, GOP, hyper-inflation, laissez faire, market regulation, Naomi Klein, neo-liberal revolution, prophets of gold, recession, Ron Paul, S&P, Shock Doctrine, Stand and Poors, stimulus, the gold standard, the new left, unfettered capitalism, unregulated market | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Don McLenaghen on January 27, 2012
Last time we discussed how fractional reserve banking can inflate the amount of money in an economy…the prophets hate inflated money.
Old fears renewed
The underlying premise of the previous planks of the prophet’s gilded construct is the idea of inflation. This actually has two parts, first is the inability to buy stuff because it becomes too expensive (classic inflation) and the devaluation of fixed assets (depreciation).
Now, it is true that fiat currency can experience hyper-inflation. It happened in Germany, Zimbabwe and other places…surprisingly a lot of ‘small’ nations have experienced hyper-inflations with little long-term detriments. The normal course of action is for a ‘revaluation’ of the currency. This has the harmful effect of wiping out ‘old money’; however for the majority of the populations (at least of these countries) poverty minimized this loss. Fixed assets are also safe for once a revaluation occurs these assets (property) are valued at the new stable currency maintaining an equivalent value prior to the hyper-inflation. That is why; those who fear hyper-inflation the most and thus preach the stability of the gold standard are those with large ‘savings’…the 1% types…those who have little real assets and thus must defend their (ironically) paper fortunes.
I am not saying hyper-inflation is always a minor and temporary event in people lives. We have all seen the wheel-barrows of money Germans needed to buy a loaf of bread. In Germany’s case, we did have a major economy hitting the wall where simple revaluation did not seem to work. Of course Germany could not simply adopt a gold standard for most of its reserves were being paid out as reparations to ‘the victors of WW1’; it eventually recovered in small steps from 1923 to 1925. Germany did end up with a gold backed mark but this ‘saviour’ became the gate way to the depression for Germany less than 5 years later.
Why did it become the gate way to depression? The one thing the prophets of the gold standard mention the most is the one thing that is the biggest asset of ‘fiat money’ – the ability of the government to control the economy. Most prophets have an extreme fear of governments and thus see anything they do as innately wrong and to be eliminated or minimized. One of the realities of the capitalist system is the boom/bust cycle. The prophets believe that the gold standard will ensure stability by prevent the government from interfering in the ‘free market’; that historically gold has had a stable price and thus countries on the gold standard do not experience (large) boom or bust cycles. Historically this is pure fantasy.
Gold-flation, the instability of Gold
Whenever a government NEEDED money, it would just drop the gold standard, print what it needed and then return to the standard when it was convenient. The prophets have an existential fear of government and somehow think that the gold standard will miraculously prevent them from interfering in the national monetary system; this too has been proven to be pure fantasy. The USA alone has been effectively on and off the gold standard three times.
Using the USA, as an example, they have experienced dozens of recessions/depressions during the 19th century. Most were quite severe because under a fixed currency there is no way for the government to ‘push back’ against the economic tsunami that ‘bust’ begets. As everyone starts to suffer, spending goes down, leading to drops in demand, businesses close or go bankrupt leading to more suffering and even less spending…what is needed is ‘push back’ to restore economic equilibrium; this is when fiat money becomes a necessity. Let us remember that is was the USA’s attempt (and Germany and others) to maintain the gold standard that pushed a recession into the worst depression in modern times. That when a government was freed from the demands of the gold standard only then could they stimulate their economy by ‘printing money’; only then did the depression end. As mentioned earlier, a direct correlation between abandoning the gold standard and recovery can be found.
Governments can both stimulate economies, in a measured and controlled way, by increasing debt via the printing of money. This stimulus creates jobs, which creates demand, which creates more jobs. As the cost of goods rise, so too do wages. When an economy becomes ‘too hot’, the government reduces spending, pulls money out of the economy via increasing taxes (which should be used to reduce the debt incurred during the stimulus phase) there will be less money in the economy, meaning less will be bought, things will become more expensive, even less will be bought and the economy gently slows down. The role of the Bank of Canada, the Federal Reserve or any central bank is to balance the money supply to ensure limited and sustainable grown while avoiding boom or bust; for the last 80yrs it has worked well. Not perfect I admit but it has done well to smooth out the peaks and valleys of the capitalist system.
Now this does require some fiscal responsibility for governments to not go overboard, however it is in the long-term interest of governments to resist; the memory of Weimar Germany shows how quickly an undisciplined printing press can lead to ruin. Lessons learnt by the major economies as can be witnessed that since the 1930’s no major depression has occurred, no major currency had experienced hyper-inflation. One of the ways that has helped prevent ‘abuse’ by politicians is that in most (all?) modern governments, there is a separation between the government and the central bank. In Canada, the Bank of Canada is technically part of the government but is administered at arm’s length by an independent governor; the same is more evident in the USA were the Federal Reserve is a private entity governed by presidential appointees
Now, you might say “what about now? The USA’s credit rating has been downgraded, Greece et al are about to default on loans, the Euro is about to crash! What about that?” Nothing to do with the gold standard but before we move on to these sexy issues lets deal with the other way inflation frightens the prophets of gold.
As mentioned there are two aspects to inflation; we have covered the supply/demand for currency and how it affects boom/bust cycles; the other is how long-term inflation can erode the value of fixed assets. In a world of ever increasing inequality, depreciation of assets is very important to the 1% (to single them out again). Inflation not only makes things more expensive but it also has the effect of eroding the value of fixed assets like property, savings, or overseas investments. If you buy a house for $100,000 at time X then sell it for 150,000 at time Y, you might think you have made 50,000; however if you factor in inflation of let’s say 10%, you only made 40,000…if its high inflation of 100% from time X to Y, you actually lost 50,000. That is why prophets of the gold standard, who constantly preach stability, have a vested interest in ensuring inflation is as close to zero as possible. The gold standard protects there ‘paper profits’ and zero inflation protects their luxury homes…their ‘comfort profits’. Now, I understand that a lot of the 99% have accepted the mantra put forward by the prophets; I am not saying that all those who want the gold standard are the 1%, but I would argue they have been duped by them. The myth of the gold standard is simple and convenient; the prophets promise in one simple move we can solve all our nation’s problems…who would not be tempted by that.
 Bernanke, Ben (March 2, 2004). “Remarks by Governor Ben S. Bernanke: Money, Gold and the Great Depression”. At the H. Parker Willis Lecture in Economic Policy, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia
 The Fed, although governed by publicly appointed governors, is private banks. It’s in their vested interest to ensure the government does not induce major, let alone hyper, inflation. They would lose the value of their primary asset – money.
Posted in Blogs, Don's Blogs | Tagged: Austrian School, Bank of Canada, boom, bust, Chicago School, debt crisis, devaluation, European Central Bank, federal reserve, fiat money, fixed currency, fractional reserve system, free market, Great Depression, hard-money, hyper-inflation, hyperinflation, market regulation, prophets of gold, recession, Ron Paul, soft-money, stimulus, the gold standard | Leave a Comment »